A volume can contain more than one legal text
The distinction between a physical volume and the works it carries changes how a manuscript enters a bibliography.
Case comments, document notes, books and research guides.
The distinction between a physical volume and the works it carries changes how a manuscript enters a bibliography.
A collection famous for one object also offers a multilingual setting for the study of texts, catalogues and legal history.
An initiative to document manuscripts in private libraries makes preservation, access and the history of ownership part of the research question.
Judith Tucker’s In the House of the Law puts legal thinkers and their treatment of family relationships at the centre of an historical inquiry.
Sarah Ghabrial’s account of her research identifies a project on women, local courts and overlapping legal orders in Algeria between 1870 and 1930.
The 2017 collection edited by Nadia Sonneveld and Monika Lindbekk separates public debate about women judges from evidence of judicial practice.
Guy Burak’s work makes the formation of an Ottoman legal establishment a question of institutions and periodization.
Julia Stephens’s Governing Islam makes the organization of religion within colonial law part of the historical problem.
Ahmed El Shamsy’s history of print culture brings the editor and the production of editions into the account of intellectual authority.
Brinkley Messick’s account of highland Yemen follows texts through the practices and institutions that gave them authority.
Wael Hallaq’s Origins and Evolution of Islamic Law provides a starting point for separating the history of texts from the development of legal institutions.
Boğaç Ergene’s study of Çankırı and Kastamonu offers a comparison of legal practice through two bounded bodies of court records.